48 State Concealed Carry Voted Down

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   At least it wasn't an overwhelming loss.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090722/ap_on_go_co/us_concealed_weapons

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
grcthird Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Senior Poster Joined: 07 September 2007 Location: Trussville Status: Offline Points: 578	Post Options Post Reply Quote grcthird Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: 48 State Concealed Carry Voted Down Posted: 22 July 2009 at 8:45am
	At least it wasn't an overwhelming loss. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090722/ap_on_go_co/us_concealed_weapons
	85 Toyota pickup with 85lbs of bondo, 33" TSLs, Spool, Warn winch, 63" chevy's, Ruf, cage and other preowned parts.

scoutman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List RCRC Club Visitor Lame Duck Past Pres, Fab Guy & Club Cook Joined: 16 February 2004 Location: Monrovia/HSV Status: Offline Points: 3232	Post Options Post Reply Quote scoutman Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 23 July 2009 at 1:29pm
	Boooooo.
	76 Scout II in pieces 96 Jeep XJ 33's 99 Jeep XJ Limited 06 Dodge 3500 W5LZQ

83K10 Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List RCRC Club & Business Member Joined: 17 February 2004 Location: Huntsville, AL Status: Offline Points: 3174	Post Options Post Reply Quote 83K10 Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 23 July 2009 at 1:53pm
	Only two away. I think we need to put it to a vote again in a year or two. John

Guests Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Guest	Post Options Post Reply Quote Guests Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 27 July 2009 at 12:37am
	This was just the Senate. How much chance do you think it would have had in the House? This does point out something that has been going on in the Senate for a long time now, the 60 vote issue. I'm damned tired of this BS. There is no such thing as a routine 60 vote requirement. 60 votes is required to stop a filibuster. When's the last time there was a filibuster in the Senate? The way it works now is "I'm going to pretend to filibuster unless you can get 60 votes together and pretend to stop my pretend filibuster." Pure BS. If you are going to filibuster then have the balls to really stand up and do it. What a bunch of spineless wonders in DC! And we just keep sending them back term after term. "Everybody else up there is a crook and needs to be replaced except my guy. My guy is great and I'm voting for him again."